The
Urantia Book does make definite reference to the sinking of an
island-peninsula that once jutted out from what is now Syria,
approximately
33,800 years ago, but the Urantia Book does not actually use the name,
"Atlantis," to refer to it.
Since the island-peninsula that had
jutted out from what is now Syria had served, approximately 4,000 years
before it sank, as the site of the *original* Garden of Eden that had
been prepared in advance of the arrival of the heavenly Adam and Eve
couple, the biologic uplifters of the human races, the Urantia Book
refers to the island-peninsula as the "Edenic Peninsula."
Hypothesis:
It does indeed seem that
Plato's legend of the sinking of Atlantis and the Urantia Book's
account of the sinking of the "Edenic
Peninsula" are one and the same event.
The Urantia Book's description of the
terrain and characteristics of the Edenic island-peninsula that once
was attached by only 27 miles to present-day Syria, and the physical
description of an island in Plato's writings are a close match.
It must be borne in mind, however,
that that would place the sinking of "Atlantis" to have been three
times further back into history than Plato's legend indicates (approx
33,800 years ago, rather than 12,500 years ago).
There is a *possibility* that the
name, "Atlantis," became attached to the sunken island-peninsula much
later after the sinking, as that event became a hazy memory and was
perpetuated orally over a period of at least 30,000 years, and as the
sinking increasingly
became associated with the retribution of the Gods, with "Atlas" and
"Poseidon," finally developing into the stuff of legend that had
suffered still more distortion before it, as a legend of completely
unrecognized antiquity, last found surviving record in Plato's
writings. The reference to the Pillars of Heracles and its
alleged placement within the legend
of Atlantis as recorded in Plato's writings may well represent
distortion owing to millennia of oral transferrence.
It may seem plausible to many that the awe-inspiring phenomenon of a
sinking island-like land mass approximately 33,800
years ago could give rise, over subsequent millennia of oral tradition,
to the
legend of Atlantis as purportedly conveyed by Critias and Timaeus and
then recorded by Plato.
Plato's
"Timaeus" To top
Plato's
"Critias"
Acknowledgment
It must be said that there is no mention of
the name, "Atlantis," in The Urantia Book. The
significance of
that fact will vary from one person to the next, from one
reader-believer
to the next.
If, in fact, the record by Plato of the accounts given by Critias and
Timaeus of their personal recollections of their childhood teachings of
what had purportedly existed on supposed and now-lost Egyptian records
actually does reflect a distant memory of the actual catastrophic event
which the Urantia Book places at over 30,000 years prior to Plato's
recording of this legend, the then-unrecognized oral tradition would
have already had an immense period of unrecognized time over which to
suffer distortion, possibly to even include an eventual invention of
the name, "Atlantis," based upon a mythological Deity, "Atlas," a name
adopted to make reference to this long-distant collective memory of a
sinking-island phenomenon, but a name that perhaps may never have
actually been used to refer to the island-peninsula by its
inhabitants prior to its sinking.
What is universally significant is that as actual
physical confirmation is found of the sunken island-peninsula and of
the civilization that succumbed to the Mediterranean waters, and as
scientific
applications fully establish its age, these findings, together with the
fact that the Urantia Book is the only source on earth to have been
pointing to and accurately dating this sunken land-mass since its
publication in 1955, will assert the revelatory
authority of The
Urantia Book.
As that reality unfolds over years, even decades, the catalyzed
social readjustments and spiritual progress will be such as the world
has never seen.